Regenerative Intelligence

Foundations of Regenerative Intelligence.

Science is the best approximation of truth that people and machine intelligence possesses.

The peer-reviewed corpus behind the company-scale framework — organizational psychology, complexity science, and the post-2020 research on hybrid work, networks, and generative AI that updated all of them.

An ultra-wide abstract composition on textured paper: smooth institutional terraces, nested arches, research corridors, dense flora, and clusters of sky-blue Alaska forget-me-nots with yellow centers.

Reference index

148 sources across 23 author groups. 48 are linked back to live essays or papers.

148Total 48Cited

Showing 148 references

A

  1. Albert, S. and D. Whetten, "Organizational Identity", in L. Cummings and B. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 7, JAI Press, pp. 263–295, 1985, ISBN 978-0-89232-497-2.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  2. Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., et al., "Concrete Problems in AI Safety", arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.1606.06565, June 2016.

  3. Aral, S., The Hype Machine: How Social Media Disrupts Our Elections, Our Economy, and Our Health—and How We Must Adapt, Currency, September 2020, ISBN 978-0-525-57451-4.

  4. Argote, L., "Knowledge Transfer Within Organizations: Mechanisms, Motivation, and Consideration", Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 405–431, DOI 10.1146/annurev-psych-022123-105424, 2024.

  5. Argote, L., Lee, S., and J. Park, "Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions", Management Science, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 5399–5429, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3693, September 2021.

  6. Argote, L., Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge, 2nd ed., Springer, December 2012, ISBN 978-1-4614-5250-8.

  7. Argote, L. and E. Miron-Spektor, "Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge", Organization Science, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1123–1137, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1100.0621, October 2011.

  8. Argyris, C., "Double Loop Learning in Organizations", Harvard Business Review, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 115–125, September 1977, hbr.org/1977/09/double-loop-learning-in-organizations.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  9. Arthur, W., "Foundations of Complexity Economics", Nature Reviews Physics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 136–145, DOI 10.1038/s42254-020-00273-3, February 2021.

  10. Arthur, W., Complexity and the Economy, Oxford University Press, October 2014, ISBN 978-0-19-933429-2.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  11. Asparouhov, T. and B. Muthén, "Multiple Group Alignment for Exploratory and Structural Equation Models", Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 169–191, DOI 10.1080/10705511.2022.2127100, 2023.

B

  1. Bai, Y., Kadavath, S., Kundu, S., et al., "Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback", arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08073, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2212.08073, December 2022.

  2. Bebchuk, L. and R. Tallarita, "The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance", Cornell Law Review, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 91–177, December 2020, scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol106/iss1/2.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  3. Beinhocker, E., The Origin of Wealth: Evolution, Complexity, and the Radical Remaking of Economics, Harvard Business School Press, May 2006, ISBN 978-1-57851-777-0.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  4. Bengio, Y., Hinton, G., Yao, A., et al., "Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress", Science, vol. 384, no. 6698, pp. 842–845, DOI 10.1126/science.adn0117, May 2024.

  5. Bernstein, E., "The Transparency Paradox: A Role for Privacy in Organizational Learning and Operational Control", Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 181–216, DOI 10.1177/0001839212453028, June 2012.

  6. Bliese, P., "Within-Group Agreement, Non-Independence, and Reliability: Implications for Data Aggregation and Analysis", in K. Klein and S. Kozlowski (eds.), Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, Jossey-Bass, 2000, ISBN 978-0-7879-5228-0.

  7. Bloom, N., Han, R., and J. Liang, "Hybrid Working from Home Improves Retention Without Damaging Performance", Nature, vol. 630, no. 8018, pp. 920–925, DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-07500-2, June 2024.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  8. Borsboom, D., Deserno, M., Rhemtulla, M., et al., "Network Analysis of Multivariate Data in Psychological Science", Nature Reviews Methods Primers, vol. 1, article 58, DOI 10.1038/s43586-021-00055-w, August 2021.

  9. Boudreau, K. and K. Lakhani, "Open Disclosure of Innovations, Incentives and Follow-on Reuse: Theory on Processes of Cumulative Innovation and a Field Experiment in Computational Biology", Research Policy, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 4–19, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2014.08.001, February 2015.

  10. Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., and L. Raymond, "Generative AI at Work", Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 889–942, DOI 10.1093/qje/qjae044, April 2025.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  11. Burt, R., "Structural Holes and Good Ideas", American Journal of Sociology, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 349–399, DOI 10.1086/421787, September 2004.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

C

  1. Centola, D., Change: How to Make Big Things Happen, Little, Brown Spark, January 2021, ISBN 978-0-316-45734-7.

  2. Centola, D., How Behavior Spreads: The Science of Complex Contagions, Princeton University Press, June 2018, ISBN 978-0-691-17531-7.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  3. Chan, D., "Functional Relations Among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models", Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 234–246, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234, April 1998.

  4. Christensen, A. and H. Golino, "Estimating the Stability of Psychological Dimensions via Bootstrap Exploratory Graph Analysis: A Monte Carlo Simulation and Tutorial", Psych, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 479–500, DOI 10.3390/psych3030032, September 2021.

  5. Christiano, P., Leike, J., Brown, T. B., et al., "Deep Reinforcement Learning from Human Preferences", arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03741, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.1706.03741, June 2017.

  6. Christianson, M. and M. Barton, "Sensemaking in the Time of COVID-19", Journal of Management Studies, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 572–576, DOI 10.1111/joms.12658, March 2021.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  7. Cronbach, L. and P. Meehl, "Construct Validity in Psychological Tests", Psychological Bulletin, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 281–302, DOI 10.1037/h0040957, July 1955.

  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, Harper & Row, March 1990, ISBN 978-0-06-016253-5.

    Cited in Foundations: Flow Is the Art of Optimal Experience in Uncertainty

D

  1. Dakos, V., Carpenter, S., Brock, W., Ellison, A., Guttal, V., Ives, A., Kéfi, S., Livina, V., Seekell, D., van Nes, E., and M. Scheffer, "Methods for Detecting Early Warnings of Critical Transitions in Time Series Illustrated Using Simulated Ecological Data", PLOS ONE, vol. 7, no. 7, Article e41010, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0041010, July 2012.

  2. Dalrymple, D., Skalse, J., Bengio, Y., et al., "Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems", arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.06624, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2405.06624, May 2024.

  3. de Holan, P. and N. Phillips, "Remembrance of Things Past? The Dynamics of Organizational Forgetting", Management Science, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 1603–1613, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0273, November 2004.

  4. Deci, E. and R. Ryan, "The \"What\" and \"Why\" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior", Psychological Inquiry, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 227–268, DOI 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01, October 2000.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  5. Dell’Acqua, F., McFowland, E., Mollick, E., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Kellogg, K., Rajendran, S., Krayer, L., Candelon, F., and K. Lakhani, "Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier: Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of AI on Knowledge Worker Productivity and Quality", Harvard Business School Working Paper 24-013, DOI 10.2139/ssrn.4573321, September 2023.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  6. Dennis, J. B., and E. C. Van Horn, "Programming Semantics for Multiprogrammed Computations", Communications of the ACM, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 143–155, DOI 10.1145/365230.365252, March 1966.

  7. Doctor, T., Witkowski, O., Solomonova, E., et al., "Biology, Buddhism, and AI: Care as the Driver of Intelligence", Entropy, vol. 24, no. 5, p. 710, DOI 10.3390/e24050710, May 2022.

  8. Doshi, A. and O. Hauser, "Generative AI Enhances Individual Creativity but Reduces the Collective Diversity of Novel Content", Science Advances, vol. 10, no. 28, Article eadn5290, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.adn5290, July 2024.

E

  1. Edelman, J., Zhi-Xuan, T., Lowe, R., et al., "Full-Stack Alignment: Co-Aligning AI and Institutions with Thick Models of Value", arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.03399, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2512.03399, December 2025.

  2. Edmans, A., Grow the Pie: How Great Companies Deliver Both Purpose and Profit, Cambridge University Press, March 2020, ISBN 978-1-108-49926-2.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  3. Edmondson, A., Right Kind of Wrong: The Science of Failing Well, Atria Books, September 2023, ISBN 978-1-9821-9506-9.

  4. Edmondson, A. and D. Bransby, "Psychological Safety Comes of Age: Observed Themes in an Established Literature", Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, vol. 10, pp. 55–78, DOI 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217, 2023.

  5. Edmondson, A., The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth, Wiley, November 2018, ISBN 978-1-119-47724-2.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  6. Edmondson, A., "Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams", Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 350–383, DOI 10.2307/2666999, June 1999.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

F

  1. Farmer, J., Making Sense of Chaos: A Better Economics for a Better World, Yale University Press, August 2024, ISBN 978-0-300-27377-9.

  2. Flake, J. and E. Fried, "Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them", Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 456–465, DOI 10.1177/2515245920952393, December 2020.

  3. Flora, D., "Your Coefficient Alpha Is Probably Wrong, but Which Coefficient Omega Is Right? A Tutorial on Using R to Obtain Better Reliability Estimates", Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 484–501, DOI 10.1177/2515245920951747, December 2020.

  4. Frazier, M., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R., Pezeshkan, A., and V. Vracheva, "Psychological Safety: A Meta-Analytic Review and Extension", Personnel Psychology, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 113–165, DOI 10.1111/peps.12183, Spring 2017.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  5. Freeman, R., Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman, 1984 (reissued Cambridge University Press, 2010), ISBN 978-0-521-15174-0.

G

  1. Galef, J., The Scout Mindset: Why Some People See Things Clearly and Others Don't, Portfolio / Penguin, April 2021, ISBN 978-0-7352-1755-3.

    Cited in Foundations: Clarity Is Freedom of Perception How to Flourish When Everything Is Falling Apart

  2. Galinsky, A., Magee, J., Inesi, M., and D. Gruenfeld, "Power and Perspectives Not Taken", Psychological Science, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1068–1074, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01824.x, December 2006.

  3. Gardner, H. and I. Matviak, Smarter Collaboration: A New Approach to Breaking Down Barriers and Transforming Work, Harvard Business Review Press, November 2022, ISBN 978-1-64782-274-3.

  4. Gioia, D., Schultz, M., and K. Corley, "Organizational Identity, Image, and Adaptive Instability", Academy of Management Review, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 63–81, DOI 10.2307/259263, January 2000.

  5. González-Romá, V. and A. Hernández, "Conducting and Evaluating Multilevel Studies: Recommendations, Resources, and a Checklist", Organizational Research Methods, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 629–654, DOI 10.1177/10944281211060712, 2022.

  6. Granovetter, M., "The Strength of Weak Ties", American Journal of Sociology, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 1360–1380, DOI 10.1086/225469, May 1973.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  7. Gratton, L., Redesigning Work: How to Transform Your Organization and Make Hybrid Work for Everyone, MIT Press, May 2022, ISBN 978-0-262-54498-6.

  8. Greco, L., Porck, J., Walter, S., Scrimpshire, A., and A. Zabinski, "A Meta-Analytic Review of Identification at Work: Relative Contribution of Team, Organizational, and Professional Identification", Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 107, no. 5, pp. 795–830, DOI 10.1037/apl0000941, 2022.

  9. Greenblatt, R., Shlegeris, B., Sachan, K., et al., "AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversion", arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06942, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2312.06942, December 2023.

  10. Greer, L., de Jong, B., Schouten, M., and J. Dannals, "Why and When Hierarchy Impacts Team Effectiveness: A Meta-Analysis", Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 591–613, DOI 10.1037/apl0000291, June 2018.

  11. Gunderson, L. and C. Holling (eds.), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Island Press, May 2002, ISBN 978-1-55963-857-9.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

H

  1. Hackman, J., Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances, Harvard Business Review Press, August 2002, ISBN 978-1-57851-333-8.

  2. Haidt, J., The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion, Pantheon Books, March 2012, ISBN 978-0-307-37790-6.

    Cited in How to Flourish When Everything Is Falling Apart

  3. Hanley, J. and B. McNeil, "The Meaning and Use of the Area Under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve", Radiology, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 29–36, DOI 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747, April 1982.

  4. Hardwicke, T. and E.-J. Wagenmakers, "Reducing Bias, Increasing Transparency and Calibrating Confidence with Preregistration", Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 15–26, DOI 10.1038/s41562-022-01497-2, January 2023.

  5. Henderson, R., Reimagining Capitalism in a World on Fire, PublicAffairs, April 2020, ISBN 978-1-5417-3015-1.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  6. Henkel, J., "Selective Revealing in Open Innovation Processes: The Case of Embedded Linux", Research Policy, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 953–969, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.010, September 2006.

  7. Holling, C., "Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems", Ecosystems, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 390–405, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5, August 2001.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  8. Holt-Lunstad, J., "Social Connection as a Critical Factor for Mental and Physical Health: Evidence, Trends, Challenges, and Future Implications", World Psychiatry, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 312–332, DOI 10.1002/wps.21224, October 2024.

    Cited in Foundations: The Surprising Science of Connection The Eight Domains of Adaptive Resilience

  9. Holt-Lunstad, J., and C. Perissinotto, "Social Isolation and Loneliness as Medical Issues", New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 388, no. 3, pp. 193–195, DOI 10.1056/NEJMp2208029, January 2023.

  10. Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T., Baker, M., Harris, T., and D. Stephenson, "Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality: A Meta-Analytic Review", Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 227–237, DOI 10.1177/1745691614568352, March 2015.

    Cited in The Eight Domains of Adaptive Resilience Foundations: The Surprising Science of Connection

I

  1. Iansiti, M. and K. Lakhani, Competing in the Age of AI: Strategy and Leadership When Algorithms and Networks Run the World, Harvard Business Review Press, January 2020, ISBN 978-1-63369-762-1.

J

  1. James, L., Demaree, R., and G. Wolf, "Estimating Within-Group Interrater Reliability With and Without Response Bias", Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 85–98, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85, February 1984.

  2. Jetten, J., Haslam, C., and S. Haslam (eds.), The Social Cure: Identity, Health and Well-Being, Psychology Press, March 2012, ISBN 978-1-84872-021-4.

    Cited in Foundations: The Surprising Science of Connection

K

  1. Kahneman, D., Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, October 2011, ISBN 978-0-374-27563-1.

    Cited in Foundations: Clarity Is Freedom of Perception How to Flourish When Everything Is Falling Apart

  2. Kim, Y.-I., VanderWeele, T. J., and B. R. Johnson, "Childhood predictors of perceptions of social trust across 22 countries in the global flourishing study", Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, art. 14358, DOI 10.1038/s41598-024-78201-z, April 2025.

  3. Klein, G., "Performing a Project Premortem", Harvard Business Review, vol. 85, no. 9, pp. 18–19, September 2007, hbr.org/2007/09/performing-a-project-premortem.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  4. Krosnick, J., "Survey Research", Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 537–567, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537, February 1999.

L

  1. Lamport, L., "Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System", Communications of the ACM, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 558–565, DOI 10.1145/359545.359563, July 1978.

  2. Laukkonen, R., Krier, S., Bakalar, C., et al., "Positive Alignment: Artificial Intelligence for Human Flourishing", arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.10310v2, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2605.10310, May 2026.

  3. Lawrence, M., Janzwood, S., and T. Homer-Dixon, "Global Polycrisis: The Causal Mechanisms of Crisis Entanglement", Global Sustainability, vol. 7, Article e6, DOI 10.1017/sus.2024.1, February 2024.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  4. Leitgöb, H., Seddig, D., Asparouhov, T., et al., "Measurement Invariance in the Social Sciences: Historical Development, Methodological Challenges, State of the Art, and Future Perspectives", Social Science Research, vol. 110, article 102805, DOI 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102805, 2023.

  5. Lindell, M. and C. Brandt, "Climate Quality and Climate Consensus as Mediators of the Relationship Between Organizational Antecedents and Outcomes", Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 331–348, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.331, June 2000.

  6. Lo, A., Adaptive Markets: Financial Evolution at the Speed of Thought, Princeton University Press, May 2017, ISBN 978-0-691-13514-4.

    Cited in Foundations: Flow Is the Art of Optimal Experience in Uncertainty

  7. Lowery, B., Selfless: The Social Creation of "You", Harper, February 2023, ISBN 978-0-06-291300-5.

  8. Lozano, L., García-Cueto, E., and J. Muñiz, "Effect of the Number of Response Categories on the Reliability and Validity of Rating Scales", Methodology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 73–79, DOI 10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.73, January 2008.

M

  1. Mael, F. and B. Ashforth, "Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification", Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 103–123, DOI 10.1002/job.4030130202, March 1992.

  2. Maitlis, S. and M. Christianson, "Sensemaking in Organizations: Taking Stock and Moving Forward", Academy of Management Annals, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57–125, DOI 10.5465/19416520.2014.873177, January 2014.

  3. Malone, T., Superminds: The Surprising Power of People and Computers Thinking Together, Little, Brown and Company, May 2018, ISBN 978-0-316-34913-0.

  4. March, J., "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning", Organization Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 71–87, DOI 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71, February 1991.

  5. Maslach, C. and M. Leiter, The Burnout Challenge: Managing People's Relationships With Their Jobs, Harvard University Press, November 2022, ISBN 978-0-674-25101-4.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  6. Maslach, C. and S. Jackson, "The Measurement of Experienced Burnout", Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 99–113, DOI 10.1002/job.4030020205, April 1981.

  7. Masucci, M., Brusoni, S., and C. Cennamo, "Removing Bottlenecks in Business Ecosystems: The Strategic Role of Outbound Open Innovation", Research Policy, vol. 49, no. 1, article 103823, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103823, February 2020.

  8. Mayer, C., "What Is Wrong with Corporate Law? The Purpose of Law and the Law of Purpose", Annual Review of Law and Social Science, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 283–296, DOI 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-050520-102251, 2022.

  9. Mayer, C., Prosperity: Better Business Makes the Greater Good, Oxford University Press, November 2018, ISBN 978-0-19-882400-8.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  10. Mayer, R., Davis, J., and F. Schoorman, "An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust", Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 709–734, DOI 10.2307/258792, July 1995.

  11. McNeish, D. and M. Wolf, "Dynamic Fit Index Cutoffs for Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models", Psychological Methods, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 61–88, DOI 10.1037/met0000425, 2023.

  12. McNeish, D., "Specifying Location-Scale Models for Heterogeneous Variances as Multilevel SEMs", Organizational Research Methods, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 187–212, DOI 10.1177/1094428120913083, 2020.

  13. Meadows, D., Thinking in Systems: A Primer, edited by Diana Wright, Chelsea Green Publishing, December 2008, ISBN 978-1-60358-055-7.

  14. Mollick, E., Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI, Portfolio / Penguin, April 2024, ISBN 978-0-593-71671-7.

N

  1. Newman, A., Donohue, R., and N. Eva, "Psychological Safety: A Systematic Review of the Literature", Human Resource Management Review, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 521–535, DOI 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001, September 2017.

  2. Nickerson, R., "Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises", Review of General Psychology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 175–220, DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175, June 1998.

    Cited in How to Flourish When Everything Is Falling Apart

  3. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, May 1995, ISBN 978-0-19-509269-1.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

O

  1. Ostrom, E., "Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems", American Economic Review, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 641–672, DOI 10.1257/aer.100.3.641, June 2010.

  2. Otis, N., Clarke, R., Delecourt, S., Holtz, D., and R. Koning, "The Uneven Impact of Generative AI on Entrepreneurial Performance", SSRN Working Paper, DOI 10.2139/ssrn.4671369, May 2024.

P

  1. Pentland, A., Social Physics: How Good Ideas Spread — The Lessons from a New Science, Penguin Press, January 2014, ISBN 978-1-59420-565-3.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  2. Petriglieri, G., Ashford, S., and A. Wrzesniewski, "Agony and Ecstasy in the Gig Economy: Cultivating Holding Environments for Precarious and Personalized Work Identities", Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 124–170, DOI 10.1177/0001839218759646, March 2019.

  3. Podsakoff, P., Podsakoff, N., Williams, L., Huang, C., and J. Yang, "Common Method Bias: It's Bad, It's Complex, It's Widespread, and It's Not Easy to Fix", Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, vol. 11, pp. 17–61, DOI 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030, 2024.

  4. Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., and N. Podsakoff, "Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies", Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 879–903, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879, October 2003.

  5. Polit, D., Beck, C., and S. Owen, "Is the CVI an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations", Research in Nursing & Health, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 459–467, DOI 10.1002/nur.20199, August 2007.

  6. Putnam, R., Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon & Schuster, August 2000, ISBN 978-0-7432-0304-3.

    Cited in Foundations: The Surprising Science of Connection

R

  1. Ravasi, D. and M. Schultz, "Responding to Organizational Identity Threats: Exploring the Role of Organizational Culture", Academy of Management Journal, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 433–458, DOI 10.5465/amj.2006.21794663, June 2006.

  2. Reed, B., "Shifting from \"Sustainability\" to Regeneration", Building Research & Information, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 674–680, DOI 10.1080/09613210701475753, November 2007.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  3. Reynolds, W., "Development of Reliable and Valid Short Forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale", Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 119–125, DOI 10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<119::AID-JCLP2270380118>3.0.CO;2-I38:1%3C119::AID-JCLP2270380118%3E3.0.CO;2-I), January 1982.

  4. Riedl, C., Kim, Y., Gupta, P., Malone, T., and A. Woolley, "Quantifying Collective Intelligence in Human Groups", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118, no. 21, Article e2005737118, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2005737118, May 2021.

S

  1. Samtani, S., Stevens, A., Numbers, K., et al., "Associations Between Social Connections and Cognition: A Global Collaborative Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis", Lancet Healthy Longevity, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. e740–e753, DOI 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00199-400199-4), November 2022.

    Cited in Foundations: The Surprising Science of Connection The Eight Domains of Adaptive Resilience

  2. Schaufeli, W., Desart, S., and H. De Witte, "Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)—Development, Validity, and Reliability", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, no. 24, article 9495, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17249495, December 2020.

  3. Scheffer, M., Bascompte, J., Brock, W., Brovkin, V., Carpenter, S., Dakos, V., Held, H., van Nes, E., Rietkerk, M., and G. Sugihara, "Early-Warning Signals for Critical Transitions", Nature, vol. 461, no. 7260, pp. 53–59, DOI 10.1038/nature08227, September 2009.

  4. Schein, E., Organizational Culture and Leadership, 4th ed., Jossey-Bass, August 2010, ISBN 978-0-470-19060-9.

  5. Schriesheim, C. and K. Hill, "Controlling Acquiescence Response Bias by Item Reversals: The Effect on Questionnaire Validity", Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1101–1114, DOI 10.1177/001316448104100420, December 1981.

  6. Senge, P., The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Doubleday/Currency, October 1990, ISBN 978-0-385-26095-4.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  7. Slavich, G., "Social Safety Theory: A Biologically Based Evolutionary Perspective on Life Stress, Health, and Behavior", Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, vol. 16, pp. 265–295, DOI 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045159, May 2020.

    Cited in The Eight Domains of Adaptive Resilience

  8. Smith, W. and M. Lewis, Both/And Thinking: Embracing Creative Tensions to Solve Your Toughest Problems, Harvard Business Review Press, August 2022, ISBN 978-1-64782-104-3.

  9. Smith, W. and M. Lewis, "Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Organizing", Academy of Management Review, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 381–403, DOI 10.5465/amr.2009.0223, April 2011.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  10. Sonnentag, S., Cheng, B., and S. Parker, "Recovery from Work: Advancing the Field Toward the Future", Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 33–60, DOI 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091355, 2022.

  11. Stanovich, K. and R. West, "On the Relative Independence of Thinking Biases and Cognitive Ability", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 672–695, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672, April 2008.

    Cited in How to Flourish When Everything Is Falling Apart

  12. Strahan, R. and K. Gerbasi, "Short, Homogeneous Versions of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale", Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 191–193, DOI 10.1002/1097-4679(197204)28:2<191::AID-JCLP2270280220>3.0.CO;2-G28:2%3C191::AID-JCLP2270280220%3E3.0.CO;2-G), April 1972.

T

  1. Tarba, S., Jansen, J., Mom, T., Raisch, S., and T. Lawton, "A Microfoundational Perspective of Organizational Ambidexterity: Critical Review and Research Directions", Long Range Planning, vol. 53, no. 6, article 102048, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102048, December 2020.

  2. Tripsas, M., "Technology, Identity, and Inertia Through the Lens of \"The Digital Photography Company\"", Organization Science, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 441–460, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1080.0419, April 2009.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  3. Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman, "Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases", Science, vol. 185, no. 4157, pp. 1124–1131, DOI 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124, September 1974.

    Cited in How to Flourish When Everything Is Falling Apart

U

  1. Uzzi, B., Mukherjee, S., Stringer, M., and B. Jones, "Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact", Science, vol. 342, no. 6157, pp. 468–472, DOI 10.1126/science.1240474, October 2013.

V

  1. van Borkulo, C., van Bork, R., Boschloo, L., et al., "Comparing Network Structures on Three Aspects: A Permutation Test", Psychological Methods, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1273–1285, DOI 10.1037/met0000476, 2023.

  2. VanderWeele, T. J., and M. T. Lee, "Love and human flourishing", International Journal of Wellbeing, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1–31, DOI 10.5502/ijw.v15i4.4663, September 2025.

  3. VanderWeele, T. J., "Flourishing and the scope of medicine and public health", Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 466–470, DOI 10.1136/jech-2023-220553, July 2024.

  4. Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R., and B. Soenens, "Basic Psychological Need Theory: Advancements, Critical Themes, and Future Directions", Motivation and Emotion, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–31, DOI 10.1007/s11031-019-09818-1, February 2020.

  5. Vispoel, W., Xu, G., and W. Schneider, "Interrelationships Between Latent State-Trait Theory and Generalizability Theory Within a Structural Equation Modeling Framework", Psychological Methods, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 773–803, DOI 10.1037/met0000290, 2022.

W

  1. Wahl, D., Designing Regenerative Cultures, Triarchy Press, May 2016, ISBN 978-1-909470-77-4.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  2. Walker, B., Holling, C., Carpenter, S., and A. Kinzig, "Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-Ecological Systems", Ecology and Society, vol. 9, no. 2, Article 5, DOI 10.5751/ES-00650-090205, December 2004.

  3. Weick, K. and K. Sutcliffe, Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty, 2nd ed., Jossey-Bass, August 2007, ISBN 978-0-7879-9649-9.

  4. Weick, K., Sensemaking in Organizations, Sage Publications, May 1995, ISBN 978-0-8039-7177-6.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  5. Weijters, B., Baumgartner, H., and N. Schillewaert, "Reversed Item Bias: An Integrative Model", Psychological Methods, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 320–334, DOI 10.1037/a0032121, September 2013.

  6. Wenger, E., Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge University Press, September 1998, ISBN 978-0-521-66363-2.

  7. West, G., Scale: The Universal Laws of Growth, Innovation, Sustainability, and the Pace of Life in Organisms, Cities, Economies, and Companies, Penguin Press, May 2017, ISBN 978-1-59420-558-3.

  8. Whetten, D., "Albert and Whetten Revisited: Strengthening the Concept of Organizational Identity", Journal of Management Inquiry, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 219–234, DOI 10.1177/1056492606291200, September 2006.

  9. Whittle, A., Vaara, E., and S. Maitlis, "The Role of Language in Organizational Sensemaking: An Integrative Theoretical Framework and an Agenda for Future Research", Journal of Management, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1807–1840, DOI 10.1177/01492063221147295, 2023.

  10. Woolley, A., Chabris, C., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., and T. Malone, "Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups", Science, vol. 330, no. 6004, pp. 686–688, DOI 10.1126/science.1193147, October 2010.

    Cited in Foundations: The Surprising Science of Connection Foundations: Flow Is the Art of Optimal Experience in Uncertainty

Y

  1. Yang, L., Holtz, D., Jaffe, S., Suri, S., Sinha, S., Weston, J., Joyce, C., Shah, N., Sherman, K., Hecht, B., and J. Teevan, "The Effects of Remote Work on Collaboration Among Information Workers", Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 43–54, DOI 10.1038/s41562-021-01196-4, January 2022.

    Cited in The Nine Capacities of a Regeneratively Intelligent Company

  2. Yang, L., Holtz, D., Jaffe, S., et al., "The Effects of Remote Work on Collaboration Among Information Workers", Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 43–54, DOI 10.1038/s41562-021-01196-4, January 2022.

  3. Yarkoni, T., "The Generalizability Crisis", Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 45, article e1, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X20001685, 2022.

Loading…